My brother is set to graduate from
college this year, and as such, he and all his friends are in the midst of
preparing their plans for life after graduation. As a computer science major,
my brother received an impressive offer relatively quickly and I’m beyond proud
of him. For those of us with a less
obviously employable major, the post-college job search can be a little
trickier. It wasn’t too long ago that my college friends and I found ourselves
in a similar place; I remember the stress of that time well. One of the popular
options for liberal arts graduates continues to be Teach For America (TFA), a
program that matches enthusiastic and bright (but often uncertified) college
grads with low-achieving schools in need of teachers.
The
critiques of TFA are fairly simple and well-established: how can we justify the
placement of teachers that are theoretically the least qualified in areas of
the country that need our best teachers the most? How can we make the case that
enthusiasm and knowledge of a particular subject area are all that is necessary
to be a competent teacher?
I’m not yet
sure where I come down in terms of efficacy of TFA. But what I’ve realized in
the past few weeks is that many of the critiques of TFA apply equally to the
Peace Corps, if not more so. TFA teachers receive five weeks of training before
they begin their school years; PCVs receive 10 and must cover many more layers
of information. Most of us find ourselves working in unfamiliar languages and
all of us must tackle many layers of cultural barriers that constantly threaten
our effectiveness. Very few PCVs come to country fully qualified for the jobs
that they will perform, and it is effectively impossible to prepare for one’s
service in advance. This is intentional; the most effective Volunteers take
their cues from existing community needs and by working with established
community leaders.
I would be
doing Peace Corps and TFA a disservice if I didn’t point out that both these
organizations are motivated by good intentions. Most TFA teachers and Peace
Corps Volunteers join their respective organizations out of a genuine desire to
influence positive change and serve their new communities. But it does seem
necessary to acknowledge the inherent sense of privilege woven into the fabric
of these and similar organizations. That we’re somehow able to bypass the
typical professional qualifications of those in our positions by merit of our
college degrees and lofty ambitions.
When I
first arrived in Cameroon, I remember being shocked to learn that the Peace
Corps had already been operating here for over 50 years. In the last year this
has come to surprise me less and less. Development is a slow and frustrating
process, and the work of American volunteers in two-year stints will never be enough
to bring about substantial change. But one of the main strengths that the Peace
Corps has over TFA is that in most cases, a PCV is an extra resource in a
community, not a substitute for a more qualified one.
No comments:
Post a Comment